- 相关推荐
复习资料GMAT优秀作文
为了方便广大考生更好的复习,综合整理了备考资料:GMAT优秀作文精选,以供各位考生考试复习参考,希望对考生复习有所帮助。
This editorial argues that, since career advancement for scientists typically require: 60 to 80 hours of work per week,affordable all-day child care must be made available to scientists of both genders if they are to advance in their fields. Moreover, the editorial urges that requirements for career advancement be made more flexible to insure that pre-school children can spend a significant amount of time each day with a parent. This argument is problematic in two crucial respects.
The major problem with the view expressed in the article is that inconsistent recommendations are endorsed in the argument. On the one hand, scientists are urged to put their children in all-day child-care facilities in order to advance their careers. On the other hand, they are encouraged to spend a significant amount of time each day with their children. Obviously, scientists cannot be expected to adhere to both of these recommend ations.
Another problem is that the recommendations are based on the assumption that e or at least most. scientists have young or preschool-age children.But the editorial provides no evidence to support this assumption, nor is this assumption very likely to be true. Since, childless scientists or scientists whose children are old enough t: take care of themselves will have no need for the services advocated in this article it is doubtful that these recommendations will receive much widespread support.
【复习资料GMAT优秀作文】相关文章:
农行校园招聘复习资料07-12
中考生物复习资料04-09
中考生物复习资料01-11
中考生物复习资料06-14
2014国考复习资料谁有?07-10
求中考复习资料,大一大二期末复习资料07-10
事业单位考试复习资料求助07-10
初一上册生物复习资料07-03
初中生物复习资料03-31
中考生物复习资料8篇04-09